Death at the Ducat: The Shooting of John Law at Newmilns

The death of John Law in, or after, the attack on Newmilns Tower on 25 April, 1685, was recorded later than any other Killing-Times historical death in 1741. Only the “martyrs of tradition” appear in the records well after 1741.

Newmilns Tower

Possibly on 25 April, 1685, John Law was shot at the Ducat Tower in Newmilns, Ayrshire. However, the early historical and tradtional sources are a little ambiguous. Was he killed during the attack on the Ducat Tower? Or was he executed by Inglis’ dragoons in revenge for the humiliation of a successful attack on their headquarters? Whatever the precise timing of his death, i.e., in the attack or very soon afterwards, Law’s shooting was part of a pattern of killings linked to the Newmilns attack.

The evidence for the death of John Law before 1741 is extremely poor, as neither Shields, nor Wodrow, recorded it. The reason that the former may not have recorded his death was probably as Law was killed in the attack on Newmilns Tower and Shields appears to have omitted deaths that categgory of deaths.

It is possible that Law was the ‘John Law, son to John Law portioner of Barneight’ in Mauchline parish, Ayrshire, who was listed on the published Fugitive Roll of 1684. (Wodrow, History, IV, 18n.)

Streetview of Barneight

A later traditional source for his death, the OS name book, stated that he was from Loudounhill in Loudoun parish.

Map of Loudounhill           Street View of Loudounhill

Given the lack of early historical evidence about Law’s death, it would be easy to doubt it if it were not for the appearance of his gravestone by Newmilns Tower before 1741.

Streetview of Newmilns Tower from Main St

John Law’s Gravestone Today

Law’s Gravestone

A record of Law’s gravestone at Newmilns first appeared in the 1741 fifth edition of Cloud of Witnesses. That is solid evidence for the erection of the gravestone prior to that date, but his stone has been replaced and moved on several occasions. For a full discussion on the different gravestones he has had and their complex history, see the end of this post.

Today, the inscription on the stone reads as follows:


Who was shot at Newmilns. At
The relieving of 8 of Christ’s
Prisoners, Who were taken at A meet[in]g
For Prayer at Little Blackwood, in the
Parish of Kilm[arnoc]k in April 1685, by Capt[ain]
INGLIS and his Party, For Their
Adherence to the Word of God
And Scotland’s Covenanted Work
of Reformation.

Cause I Christ’s Prisoners reliev’d
I of my Life was soon bereaved
By cruel Enemies with rage
In that Rencounter did engage.
The Martyr’s honour & his crown
Bestow’d on me O high Renown,
That I Should not only believe,
But For Christ’s cause my life
should give.

in 1822, 1930 and 1996’

The Ducat Tower a.ka. Newmilns Tower

What does Law’s gravestone record about the circumstances of his death? It is clear from the history of Law’s gravestone that prior to 1741 a version of his death existed and that it was the basis for the inscription. There is no other source.

According to the inscription, Law took part in the attack on Newmilns Tower in April 1685 that rescued eight prisoners. At some point in the rescue, or after, he was shot by Captain Inglis’ dragoons and was buried in a kailyard.

The precise chronology of his shooting is not clear. Was he shot during the attack? Or was he executed after the attack? In 1865, Thomson thought that Law’s death may have been after the attack: ‘The Cloud of Witnesses says nothing of any loss on the part of the Covenanters while breaking into the prison, so that John Law must have been afterwards discovered and shot’.

It is perhaps unreasonable to subject the inscription to intense scrutiny. The inscription provides two clues as to the timing of his death.

First, Law was ‘was shot at Newmills, at the relieving of 8 of Christ’s prisoners’ who had been captured in April 1685. At first sight, the use of ‘at’ would seem to confirm that he was killed either in the attack or in the immediate aftermath of it. However, ‘at’ may have been used in a more general sense to denote “as a result of the prisoner rescue”.

From an entry in the registers of the Privy Council, it is clear that the raid on Little Blackwood where the prisoners were captured was in March, 1685. That took place several weeks before the attack on Newmilns Tower, which from a letter from John Graham of Claverhouse of 3 May, took place on Saturday 25 April, 1685. (Campbell, Standing Witnesses, 207.)

Second, the inscribed poem on the gravestone may imply that Law was shot after the ‘rencounter’ at Newmilns Tower: ‘Cause I Christ’s prisoners reliev’d, I of my life was soon beriev’d’.

The single early source for the his death leaves open that it is possible that Law was killed either in, or ‘soon’ after, the rescue of the prisoners on 25 April. The balance of evidence probably points to soon after the attack.

Later Traditions of Law’s Death

Over a hundred years later, the ambiguity in the timing of Law’s shooting was reflected in rival traditions about when Law was killed.

The OS Name Book Tradition

According to local traditions found in the mid-nineteenth-cetury OS name book:

‘A party of Covenanters taken prisoners by Capt. Inglis at Little Blackwood in the parish of Kilmarnock in the year 1685, were confined in this Castle but rescued by their friends. Two soldiers were killed in the fray and one of the assailants named John Law was shot from the top of the Castle.’

In it, Law was killed in the attack and shot from the battlements of the tower, possibly where he was buried in the kailyard. A second entry in the name book on the grave is the first to identify Law as ‘John Law in Loudounhill’, a farm that lies in the east of the parish.

Macleod’s Tradition, 1845
In 1845, the Reverend Norman Macleod of Loudoun parish gave the first detailed account of the attack Newmilns Tower in the New Statistical Account:

‘This was Captain Inglis’s head-quarters when in the district. [… After a raid on Little Blackwood in Fenwick parish, Cornet Peter] Inglis [or Captain John Inglis] was about to shoot the others [i.e. the prisoners taken in the Little Blackwood raid], when it was suggested to him that it would be prudent to get a written order from Edinburgh for the execution. The seven men in the meantime, were confined in the old tower [at Newmilns]. But while the troop was absent on one of its bloody raids, with the exception of a small guard, a man named Browning [a.k.a. John Brounen], from Lanfine, with others who had been with him at Airds Moss, got large hammers from the old smithy, […] with which they broke open the prison doors, and permitted the Covenanters to escape. John Law, (brother-in-law to Captain [John] Nisbet [of Hardhill],) was shot in this exploit, and is buried close to the wall of the tower. The dragoons soon went in pursuit of the prisoners, but they had reached the heather, and there no cavalry could pursue them’. (NSA, V, 838.)

Macleod was the first to identify Law as the ‘brother-in-law’ of Captain John Nisbet of Hardhill, who was executed December 1685. Hardhill’s wife was Margaret Law. That suggests that Law was middle-aged, as Hardhill was nearly sixty in 1685. Hardhill was part of an extensive local kin network of Society people that included John Nisbet of Glen (executed April 1683), James Nisbet of Highside (executed June 1684), and Hardhill’s son, James Nisbet, who was with Alexander Peden in late April 1685, i.e., at around the time of the attack on the Tower.

Macleod does not leave any doubt that Law was shot in the action at Newmilns Tower. A few years later, Thomson recorded that all of the Newmilns prisoners escaped, but he did not discuss Law’s death. (Thomson (ed.), CW, 546-7, 599.)

M’Kay’s Tradition, 1848
Macleod’s version of Law’s death was soon challenged by an alternative tradition that outlined a radically different chronology for Law’s end.

In 1848, Archibald M’Kay in his History of Kilmarnock alluded to Law’s death, although he neither mentioned Law by name, nor mentioned his involvement in the attack on Newmilns Tower. According to M’Kay, after the rescued prisoners from Newmilns Tower were ‘marched triumphantly out of town’:

‘Next day the Captain [Inglis] caused the whole of the place to be searched for the actors, and learning that they had fled to the country, he despatched his men in pursuit of them. They found not a single person, however, who had been engaged in the affair; but on the same day another and a darker deed of infamy characterised their proceedings; for, actuated by feelings of disappointment and revenge, they shot, it is said, two innocent men when returning from their bloody raid’. (M’Kay, The History of Kilmarnock (1858, 2nd edition), 55.)

M’Kay inaccurately dated the attack on Newmilns Tower to ‘May’, when it plainly took place on 25 April.

M’Kay’s version presents us with a conundrum, as he does not mention Law as being shot in the attack, but he does mention that two men were killed in revenge for the rescue.

His narrative implies that Law may have been one of the two ‘innocent’ men captured in a sweep by Captain Inglis’ dragoons after the attack on Newmilns Tower, rather than killed during the storming of it.

It was not unusual for Covenanters to be summarily executed at the site of rescues, especially where soldiers had been killed. For example, see the executions at Caldons.

The other ‘innocent’ man that M’Kay may have referred to was John Smith in Cronan, whose shooting in the aftermath of the attack was recorded by Macleod.

However, there are other individuals locally who may have died in the aftermath of the attack on the Tower.

James Smith in Threepwood was wounded when he was captured in the raid on his farm at Threepwood, perhaps before 3 May 1685. While the badly injured Smith was sent to Mauchline, where he later died.

One possible intriguing link to the shooting of John Law (and the capture of James Smith in Threepwood) is that John Brounen, who did take part in the attack on Newmilns Tower, provided John Graham of Claverhouse with intelligence about those involved on 1 May. Was Law captured and summarily executed at the site of his crime?

Covenanter Memorial Walter Baxter © Copyright Walter Baxter and licensed for reuse.

Other Memorials To Law

Law’s death is also recorded on a monument to local Covenanters erected in 1913 outsideLoudoun parish church on Main Street (i.e. the A71) in Newmilns. It is inscribed as follows on the side facing towards Main Street:


In Commemoration

It is possible that Law was not a resident of Loudoun parish, but a later tradition certainly linked him to the farm of Loudounhill in the parish. On the side facing towards Newmilns Tower, he is recorded along with his kin, John Nisbet of Highside, James Nisbet of Glen and John Nisbet of Hardhill:






JOHN NISBET [of Hardhill] SENR


Detail of Inscription on the Monument

On the opposite side, facing east:

‘“These are they who came
out of great tribulation.”
REV. VII.14.


Loudoun parish church can be easily located from Castle Street and Newmilns Tower.

Loudon Church from the entry to Castle St © Copyright Walter Baxter and licensed for reuse.

Streetview of Monument

A second and more recent memorial to him can be found attached to the church wall.

John Law Memorial © Copyright Walter Baxter and licensed for reuse.

The Complex History of Law’s Gravestone

The present gravestone is of modern origin. Its inscription clearly dates to 1930 or 1996. Built into a wall, it is formed out of two separate machine-cut blocks. Only the first line of the inscription, ‘Here lies John Law’, appears on the upper block, while the lower block utilises distinctive typographic symbols that are familiar from printed works like Cloud of Witnesses. Just before it was renewed in 1996, Campbell visited the stone ‘renewed’ in 1930, which he described as ‘now very badly weathered, in spite of frequent renewals, and is almost illegible’.

He recorded the inscription on the stone renewed in 1930, which in some of its typographic elements, spellings and punctuation was different from the present stone:

Who was shot at Newmilns AT
The relieving of 8 of Christ’s
Prisoners, Who were taken at A meetg
For Prayer at Little Blackwood, in the
Parish of Kilmk in April 1685, By Capt
INGLIS and his Party, For Their
Adherence to the Word of God
And Scotland’s Covenanted Work
of Reformation
Cause I Christ’s Prisoners relieved
I of my life was soon beriev’d
By cruel Enemies with rage
In that Rencounter did engage
The Martyr’s honour and his Crown
Restow’d on me, O high Renown
That I Should not only believe
But For Christ’s cause my Life
should give.
in 1822 and 1930’
(Campbell, Standing Witnesses, 147.)

The stone we see today is not the stone which was ‘renewed’ in 1930. However, the 1930 stone was also not the stone ‘renewed’ in 1822. The inscription of the 1822 stone, which was accurately recorded by Thomson in his  ‘Travels of a Country Minister in his Own Country’ published in the Reformed Presbyterian Magazine of October 1865, demonstrates that they were separate stones.

The 1822 stone was different in several regards from the 1930 stone. The 1822 stone did not capitalise ‘Here’ in ‘HERE LIES…’.  It did use the same contraction of Kilmarnock, but it captitalised the first four letters, i.e. ‘KILMk’, instead of ‘Kilmk’. It shortened both ‘reliev’d’ and ‘beriev’d’, unlike the two later stones. It also capitalised ‘CHRIST’ on every occasion and referred to ‘NEWMILLS’, rather than ‘Newmilns’. Crucially, the initial three words of the inscription as recorded by Thomson and Cloud – ‘RENEWED IN 1822’ – have moved from the beginning of the inscription to the end of the inscription on the 1930 stone, when it became ‘RENEWED in 1822 and 1930′.

The version of the 1822 inscription in Cloud is different from that given by Thomson in 1865, but not on a fundamental level. Any differences are almost certainly down to Cloud’s inaccurate transcription of the exact details of the text:

‘Renewed in 1822. Here lies John Law, who was shot at Newmills, at the relieving of eight of Christ’s prisoners, who were taken at a meeting for prayer at Little Blackwood, in the parish of Kilmarnock, in April 1685, by Captain Inglis and his party, for their adherence to the Word of God, and Scotland’s Covenanted Work of Reformation.’

‘Cause I Christ’s prisoners reliev’d,
I of my life was soon bereav’d,
By cruel enemies with rage,
In that rencounter did engage,
The Martyr’s honour and his crown,
Bestow’d on me, O high renown,
That I should not only believe,
But for Christ’s cause my life should give.’

The First Marker Stone for Law’s Death
The gravestone “renewed” in 1822 is linked to an earlier stone first recorded in Cloud of Witnesses in 1741. Cloud recorded that Law’s grave was situated ‘in a kailyard’ [or kitchen garden] in Newmilns. Thomson’s ‘Travels’ provided a little more detail when he stated that the 1822 stone lay ‘in a kailyard behind a house on the opposite side of the street to the parish church, and somewhat before we come to the church’.

When the the original stone was erected in the kailyard prior to 1741 is not clear. It was certainly after 1702 when the Continuing Society people first erected memorial stones and may have been just before 1741. Its inscription was almost certainly the same as that found on the renewed 1822 stone, as it contains archaic word forms and typographic elements, such as the contraction ‘KILMk’ etc., which were later transferred on to the later 1930 and 1996 stones. The form of the inscription is also similar to that used on the gravestone of John Smith at Muirkirk. That may suggest that the original stone was of a similar kind to the Muirkirk stone, i.e. one which was inscribed on two sides with the poem on the reverse, before it was ‘renewed’ in 1822 with the additional words added to the top of the inscription. (The inscriptions from both stones are listed on the same page on Cloud of Witnesses. Thomson (ed.), CW, 599.)

At some point after 1865 and before 1881, the stone renewed in 1822 was moved, as Gibson records that the grave was ‘in the garden of the farm adjoining the castle [i.e. Newmilns Tower], his grave being marked by a stone which is now removed and fixed in the gable of an old thatched house opposite the entrance to the United Presbyterian Church’. (See Canmore site here.)

The church, built in 1833 by the United Associate Synod (or Secession Church) that became the United Presbyterian Church in 1847, was demolished some time ago and has been replaced by flats. However, old OS maps show that the open entranceway to the church lay on the north side of High Street and the thatched cottage lay somewhere on the opposite side of the street. It is not clear if the thatched cottage was connected to the kailyard, but both lay close to Newmilns Tower. (NSA, V, 851.)

Streetview of the former site of the UP Church on High Street

According to the Royal Commission of Ancient and Historical Monuments Scotland, the wall of the cottage lay at NS 5362 3735. A view of the former site of the cottage and the kailyard to the left of it can be found on Streetview.

Streetview of the location of the cottage and the kailyard

The ‘removal’ of the stone from the kailyard grave site after 1865 may explain the disappearance of the original stone, if it was a different stone from the one ‘renewed’ in 1822. What seems reasonably clear from Gibson’s information is that it was the stone ‘renewed’ in 1822 which was relocated. When the gravestone was relocated from the kailyard to the wall of the cottage, it no longer marked Law’s grave.

It is possible that the present stone may reflect that move, as the first line of the inscription – ‘Here lies John Law’ – is carved on a separate block from the rest of the inscription when one would expect all of the text to be carved on one stone.

According to the RCAHMS, the stone which was recorded as being fixed to the gable wall of the cottage remained there until at least 1982. That must refer to the 1930 stone, as although the 1822 stone was moved to the gable wall after 1865, it was replaced by the 1930 stone. Somewhere along the line, probably in 1930, the 1822 stone disappeared.

The stone was ‘renewed’ for a third time in 1996 and seems to have been moved (again?) to the courtyard of Newmilns Tower. If anyone has any information on the stone or the original location of the grave, please do not hesitate get in touch to help clarify matters.

Return to Homepage

Text © Copyright Dr Mark Jardine. All Rights Reserved. Please link to this post on Facebook or other social networks or retweet it, but do not reblog in FULL without the express permission of the author @drmarkjardine

~ by drmarkjardine on October 19, 2010.

7 Responses to “Death at the Ducat: The Shooting of John Law at Newmilns”

  1. Hi Mark – glad you have found my Galloway Levellers study. In the Kirkcudbright Sheriff Court Deeds 1623-1700 there are useful ‘snippets’ on the events 1660-1688. For example various debts and wadsets by McLellan of Barscobe which show that by 1666 (Dalry/Pentland Uprising) he was deeply in debt. So,like some of the later Jacobites, he may have hoped a successful uprising would restore his fortunes in this world -rather than having a more religious motivation for particpation.

  2. […] earliest of the later sources is the inscription on John Law’s grave in Newmilns. The inscription, which must predate 1822 when it was ‘renewed’ and may date to the mid […]

  3. […] Smith in Cronan (4-c.10 May?), John Brounen or Browning (c.6-10 May?) and perhaps James White and John Law. It is possible that the capture of William Campbell in Upper Wellwood and John Campbell of Mid […]

  4. […] the grave of John Law who took part in the attack to liberated Finlay and was shot at Newmilns appears to date the raid […]

  5. […] the Covenanters forced entry into the tower and rescued the prisoners. One of the attackers, John Law, was shot dead as they forced their way in. (Campbell, Standing Witnesses, 147-51; NSA, V, 838; Archibald M’Kay, The History of Kilmarnock, […]

  6. […] For a discussion of John Law’s death, see here. […]

  7. […] John Law, (brother-in-law to Captain [John] Nisbet [of Hardhill],) was shot in this exploit, and is buried close to the wall of the tower. […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.